Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Fits Ford Ranger 2WD/4WD (1983-2011) V2 Rear Shocks; 7.5-8"; 760762_EV2 Rear Shocks 7. 5 8" Ford Ranger 2WD 4WD (1983 2011) Whether you're tackling tough terrain or smooth city streets, Rough Country's Nitrogen charged V2 Monotube Shock Absorber leads the way, delivering impeccable ride quality and performance mile after mile. Rough Country's Monotube V2 Shocks feature an internal floating piston design that keeps the shock oil and high pressure nitrogen separate. The result is a lightning fast reaction with no
V2 Rear Shocks - 7.5-8" - Ford Ranger 2WD/4WD (1983-2011)
Whether you're tackling tough terrain or smooth city streets, Rough Country's Nitrogen-charged V2 Monotube Shock Absorber leads the way, delivering impeccable ride quality and performance mile after mile. Rough Country's Monotube V2 Shocks feature an internal floating piston design that keeps the shock oil and high-pressure nitrogen separate. The result is a lightning-fast reaction with no cavitation - just unbridled vibration damping at each and every obstacle. The V2 Monotube Shock Absorber is more than an upgrade - it's a true performance shock. Each shock features a T6061 brushed aluminum body with black anodized accents giving it a striking visual appearance that also dissipates heat faster than other materials. The internal 46mm high-flow piston offers countless years of durability. The V2 is designed to be mounted body-up for a more interesting look on the vehicle.
Features:
- Incredible ride quality & performance
- Monotube design
- Internal floating piston
- Nitrogen-charged 46mm high-flow piston
- Fast heat dissipation
- 36kN Tensile Strength
- Mounts inverted
- T6061 brushed aluminum body
- 3-year Manufacturer's Warranty
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991-2011 | Ford | Ranger | Sport |
| 1983-2011 | Ford | Ranger | XL |
| 1983-2011 | Ford | Ranger | XLT |
| 2005-2009 | Ford | Ranger | FX4 |
| 1986-2007 | Ford | Ranger | STX |
| 2001-2005 | Ford | Ranger | Edge |
| 2004-2004 | Ford | Ranger | Tremor |
| 1998-2002 | Ford | Ranger | EV |
| 1993-1998 | Ford | Ranger | Splash |
| 1994-1998 | Ford | Ranger | Splash |
| 1986-1997 | Ford | Ranger | STX |
| 1995-1995 | Ford | Ranger | XL Sport |
| 1987-1992 | Ford | Ranger | Custom |
| 1984-1992 | Ford | Ranger | S |
| 1990-1990 | Ford | Ranger | S Plus |
| 1988-1989 | Ford | Ranger | GT |
| 1983-1986 | Ford | Ranger | Base |
| 1983-1985 | Ford | Ranger | XLS |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1428 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
revisar antes de mandarlo
Size: 1.69 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
no bueno porque estaba roto el pomo
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Protector solar e hidratante
Este protector solar es el mejor que he probado aparte que protege mi piel la deja súper hidratada, no deja residuos blancos ni irrita los ojos eso es lo mejor de este protector desde que empecé a usarlo 2 años atrás no lo cambio por ninguno
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2025
★★★★★ 5
will purchase again
Style: Face, Size: 2 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is a really great sunscreen. Leaves your skin moisturized and does not leave a white residue. I always wear sunscreen and this is a winner to me. Smells nice too.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Is this even real?!!!
Style: Face, Size: 2 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Ok, I am a sunscreen fanatic and have tried most products on the market and I am SO impressed with this product!!! It is by far the best daily facial sunscreen I've used so far!!! I really can hardly believe it is a (non-nano) zinc base as it leave absolutely NO whitish finish.
First of all, it's hard to find a sunscreen with only physical UV blockers (zinc or titanium) without any added chemical blockers. There are a few (including the Korean skincare products) but they ALL leave a white film. This is the FIRST all zinc sunscreen that looks completely natural after application. I still have NO idea how they did this without using nano-zinc!!!
Second, the texture and finish are so light and non-greasy that I cannot tell that I put anything on my face. It's fantastic!!! It absorbs right in!! Granted, I do not have oily skin so I cannot speak for someone who does. It isn't drying but also not super moisturizing so if you have dry skin, you might want to use a heavier cream under this product.
Third, the smell is light and pleasant. i do not find it overwhelming or distracting. I rather like it.
The downsides are (1) it is not inexpensive at about $20/2 oz and (2) it is not sweat resistant (though it suppose that would come at a cost of a more greasy texture).
I love love love this sunscreen!!! I only started using it recently so I'll see if it really works well to protect my face from UV exposure... I'll update this later regarding the effectiveness as a sunscreen.
Thanks for a fantastic product!!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2020
★★★★★ 4
no white cast, super moisturizing, dewy finish, citrus scent
Style: Face, Size: 2 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style: Face, Size: 2 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I have a shelf of sunscreens. I am trying to find the perfect sunscreen for daily use on my face. I happen to be fair skinned, so if it happens to have a white cast, it isn't too noticeable. But still, I'd like to not even have to worry about it. I also would prefer not to use chemical sunscreens. I often use those on my body, but for my face which is more sensitive- the physical (mineral) sunscreens is better for me. There is NO white cast with this, so definitely fine for darker skin tones if you are looking for a physical sunscreen.
This sunscreen is nice. I hot days or days I know where I will be sweating a bit, I don't bother with my expensive skin care routine, since I am likely to sweat it off. This sunscreen offers some skin care goodies above and beyond non nano zinc oxide. So I feel like I am still doing something for my skin, including moisturizing it. According to description, it has antioxidant super plants:
--Juanilama: anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-oxidant (87% more than vitamin E) properties, and
--Fierillo: anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, skin healing, and antioxidant properties;
plus..
--Wakame Kelp: reinforce skin defenses again environment, etc
--Tazman Pepper: reduces skin inflammation and redness, and
--Arabica coffee oil: lubricates skin. regenerates hydrolipid barrier to promote hydration and skin repairing.
Smells energizing- like a punch of citrus fruit. It lingers for a little while then seems to dissipate. I can get it near my eyes and they don't get irritated. Kinda surprised it is a strong scent for something that is likely to go on the face.
Bottles says no synthetic colors, fragrances or unhealthy ingredients. "Fragrance" is vague here, and although maybe not synthetic, it should be cleared up as to what it is.
The company says in answering one of the questions that the fragrance comes from essential oils- if so, they should list the essential oils used. I imagine it is a citrus blend, but essential oils are different than just listing "fragrance". It would be helpful to see exact oils used. Then in another question answered, it was not mentioned that essential oils are used to create fragrance, but that it would be naturally occurring from some of the other ingredients. Which is it? If it is the latter, then the company would be doing themselves a favor by taking the word fragrance out of the ingredient list since not only would it be redundant to keep it in there it could scare off people who are avoiding "fragrance" as a listed ingredient. A product can have a scent due to other ingredients used that have a naturally occurring scent .. and and still be fragrance free. If it is a matter of it being from essential oils.. then that should be listed as well- for better or worse- but at least it is transparent information. Some people have strong reactions to essential oils on their face, whether from scent or from the activity they have. Some dont have reaction. Yet Some have strong reactions to "fragrance" as an added ingredient. Normally I see "fragrance" on a bottle and choose something else, as it typically depicts synthetic, and if it isn't synthetic then it doesn't need to be listed generically as fragrance, but instead specifically as to what the fragrance is derived from.
Anyway, I thought I would add that as I am sure there will be potential customers looking at the ingredient list and this may help them one way or another. I hope this review has been helpful to you. If I learn anything new, I will be sure to come back to update. Take care all :)
List of ingredients:
Water, Coco-Caprylate, Dicaprylyl Carbonate, Glycerin, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Lauryl Glucoside, Polyglyceryl-2 Dipolyhydroxystearate, Cetyl Alcohol, Coffea Arabica (Coffee) Seed Oil, Polyhydroxystearic Acid, Cellulose Gum, Xanthan Gum, Phytic Acid, Arrabidaea Chica, Lippia Alba, Undaria Pinnatifida Extract, Ethyl Macadamiate, Tasmannia Lanceolata Fruit Extract, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Rosemarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract, Fragrance, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 15, 2019